<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1550 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369584</link>
    <description>The Court did not entertain the Appellant&#039;s challenges to the demand on merits as they were not contested before any authority. Additionally, the issue of confirming interest demand despite a balance in the cenvat credit account was not considered by the Tribunal as it was not raised before them. The Appeal was admitted based on a substantial question of law mentioned in another point, with the Respondent&#039;s counsel waiving service for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1550 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369584</link>
      <description>The Court did not entertain the Appellant&#039;s challenges to the demand on merits as they were not contested before any authority. Additionally, the issue of confirming interest demand despite a balance in the cenvat credit account was not considered by the Tribunal as it was not raised before them. The Appeal was admitted based on a substantial question of law mentioned in another point, with the Respondent&#039;s counsel waiving service for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>