<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1540 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to verify the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 6 provisions and the reversal of proportionate credit. The Tribunal emphasized the flexibility provided under the rule and the retrospective nature of relevant amendments, finding the demand for 6% on exempted services unsustainable in light of the appellant&#039;s compliance and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1540 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case to verify the appellant&#039;s compliance with Rule 6 provisions and the reversal of proportionate credit. The Tribunal emphasized the flexibility provided under the rule and the retrospective nature of relevant amendments, finding the demand for 6% on exempted services unsustainable in light of the appellant&#039;s compliance and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>