<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1228 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276132</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for fresh consideration. The appellant was directed to cooperate and present their defense with additional documents. The tribunal emphasized providing a fair opportunity for the appellant during the reconsideration process, setting aside the previous decision imposing duty, interest, and penalty based on discrepancies in reported sales figures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 20:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1228 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276132</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for fresh consideration. The appellant was directed to cooperate and present their defense with additional documents. The tribunal emphasized providing a fair opportunity for the appellant during the reconsideration process, setting aside the previous decision imposing duty, interest, and penalty based on discrepancies in reported sales figures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>