<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276131</link>
    <description>Excess profits tax liability became enforceable only upon assessment and service of a demand notice; prior service of notices did not create an existing recoverable debt. The Excess Profits Tax Act charged the business but required assessment and recovery from the person carrying on it, without a provision permitting assessment of members after disruption of a Hindu undivided family. Consequently, Hindu law principles concerning post-partition liability for family debts did not apply where no enforceable tax debt existed on the disruption date. Excess profits tax could not be assessed or recovered from the disrupted Hindu undivided family or its members on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 75 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276131</link>
      <description>Excess profits tax liability became enforceable only upon assessment and service of a demand notice; prior service of notices did not create an existing recoverable debt. The Excess Profits Tax Act charged the business but required assessment and recovery from the person carrying on it, without a provision permitting assessment of members after disruption of a Hindu undivided family. Consequently, Hindu law principles concerning post-partition liability for family debts did not apply where no enforceable tax debt existed on the disruption date. Excess profits tax could not be assessed or recovered from the disrupted Hindu undivided family or its members on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>