https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276128 Where the last day for filing a substitution application falls on a day when the Court is closed, Section 4 of the Limitation Act extends the prescribed period to the next day the Court reopens. The Calcutta HC held that an application to substitute the legal representatives of a deceased respondent, filed on the first court day after expiry of limitation, was within time under Order 22 Rule 4(1) CPC. As the application was treated as timely, no abatement arose under Order 22 Rule 4(3), and the earlier contrary view that Section 4 could not avert abatement was not accepted. en-us Wed, 30 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:24:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276128 Where the last day for filing a substitution application falls on a day when the Court is closed, Section 4 of the Limitation Act extends the prescribed period to the next day the Court reopens. The Calcutta HC held that an application to substitute the legal representatives of a deceased respondent, filed on the first court day after expiry of limitation, was within time under Order 22 Rule 4(1) CPC. As the application was treated as timely, no abatement arose under Order 22 Rule 4(3), and the earlier contrary view that Section 4 could not avert abatement was not accepted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276128