<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (10) TMI 10 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276127</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Additional District Judge in a case concerning the setting aside of a court sale. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and fulfilling the conditions precedent for such actions. The revision application was dismissed, and costs were imposed on the applicant&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (10) TMI 10 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276127</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Additional District Judge in a case concerning the setting aside of a court sale. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the limitation period and fulfilling the conditions precedent for such actions. The revision application was dismissed, and costs were imposed on the applicant&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>