https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276126 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting joint possession and mesne profits for fields 104, 105, and 106 in mahal No. 3. The judgment clarified the application of Section 4, Limitation Act to cross-objections and analyzed historical ownership to determine rightful ownership. The plaintiff was awarded 1/3 interest in the fields due to joint possession by co-sharers. Additionally, the plaintiff was entitled to mesne profits for the years 1941-1945. The lower court's decree was modified, and costs were allocated based on the outcome in all courts involved. en-us Wed, 17 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276126 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting joint possession and mesne profits for fields 104, 105, and 106 in mahal No. 3. The judgment clarified the application of Section 4, Limitation Act to cross-objections and analyzed historical ownership to determine rightful ownership. The plaintiff was awarded 1/3 interest in the fields due to joint possession by co-sharers. Additionally, the plaintiff was entitled to mesne profits for the years 1941-1945. The lower court's decree was modified, and costs were allocated based on the outcome in all courts involved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276126