<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 966 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, condoning the delay in filing and dismissing the ground related to notice service. It found the addition of income based on alleged receipt lacking concrete evidence and reduced the addition to 1.5% of the gross receipts, citing lack of substantial inquiry by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 966 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, condoning the delay in filing and dismissing the ground related to notice service. It found the addition of income based on alleged receipt lacking concrete evidence and reduced the addition to 1.5% of the gross receipts, citing lack of substantial inquiry by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>