<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1484 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in interpreting the limitation period, setting aside the decision and rejecting the refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and time limits for refund claims, ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1484 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in interpreting the limitation period, setting aside the decision and rejecting the refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and time limits for refund claims, ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>