<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing the absence of identifiable infirmity warranting rectification. The decision underscored the importance of judicial discipline and the finality of court judgments to uphold public trust in the judiciary. The Tribunal concluded that no error apparent on record justified rectification, after considering arguments from both parties and adhering to legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order, emphasizing the absence of identifiable infirmity warranting rectification. The decision underscored the importance of judicial discipline and the finality of court judgments to uphold public trust in the judiciary. The Tribunal concluded that no error apparent on record justified rectification, after considering arguments from both parties and adhering to legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>