<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1463 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmed demand for Central Excise duty on goods cleared without proper invoices. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the demand, particularly regarding the liability for Central Excise duty on various categories of goods. As a result, the Order confirming the demand was set aside, emphasizing the importance of meeting evidentiary standards in excise duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:01:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1463 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmed demand for Central Excise duty on goods cleared without proper invoices. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the demand, particularly regarding the liability for Central Excise duty on various categories of goods. As a result, the Order confirming the demand was set aside, emphasizing the importance of meeting evidentiary standards in excise duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>