https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276103 The judgment directs the matter to be remanded to the original adjudicating authority for document verification and sanctioning of rebate claims due to discrepancies in naming conventions in FIRCs. The appellants provided certificates confirming the exports were made by the specific unit, clarifying the naming discrepancy. The decision underscores the importance of accurate documentation and verification in rebate claims, ensuring procedural fairness by allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case. The judgment emphasizes thorough verification before rejecting rebate claims and clarifies the process for handling documentation discrepancies. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:59:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276103 The judgment directs the matter to be remanded to the original adjudicating authority for document verification and sanctioning of rebate claims due to discrepancies in naming conventions in FIRCs. The appellants provided certificates confirming the exports were made by the specific unit, clarifying the naming discrepancy. The decision underscores the importance of accurate documentation and verification in rebate claims, ensuring procedural fairness by allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case. The judgment emphasizes thorough verification before rejecting rebate claims and clarifies the process for handling documentation discrepancies. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276103