https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276096 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The addition of agricultural income was partially sustained, with the added amount of &8377; 15,000 not upheld due to lack of enhancement notice. Estimated household expenses addition was upheld based on total withdrawals. The addition of cash deposit in the bank account was reversed as the assessing authority failed to prove misuse of funds. Unaccounted bank interest addition was upheld due to lack of evidence. Another addition was not pressed and dismissed. en-us Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:00:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276096 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The addition of agricultural income was partially sustained, with the added amount of &8377; 15,000 not upheld due to lack of enhancement notice. Estimated household expenses addition was upheld based on total withdrawals. The addition of cash deposit in the bank account was reversed as the assessing authority failed to prove misuse of funds. Unaccounted bank interest addition was upheld due to lack of evidence. Another addition was not pressed and dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276096