<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (5) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276092</link>
    <description>Under the Bombay Rent Act, a landlord&#039;s right to recover possession arises only after valid determination of the contractual tenancy by notice to quit, and section 12 operates as a restriction on that existing right rather than creating a fresh right of eviction. Section 27 and rule 4 regulate rent recovery by the British calendar, but do not convert the contractual month of tenancy from the Indian calendar. Where the statutory conditions in section 12(3)(a) are satisfied, later payment of arrears after suit does not defeat eviction and the court has no discretion to refuse a decree; discretion is confined to section 12(3)(b).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:05:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (5) TMI 44 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276092</link>
      <description>Under the Bombay Rent Act, a landlord&#039;s right to recover possession arises only after valid determination of the contractual tenancy by notice to quit, and section 12 operates as a restriction on that existing right rather than creating a fresh right of eviction. Section 27 and rule 4 regulate rent recovery by the British calendar, but do not convert the contractual month of tenancy from the Indian calendar. Where the statutory conditions in section 12(3)(a) are satisfied, later payment of arrears after suit does not defeat eviction and the court has no discretion to refuse a decree; discretion is confined to section 12(3)(b).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>