<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276091</link>
    <description>The appeals of both the department and the assessee were allowed in part. The Tribunal remanded several issues back to the AO or CIT (A) for fresh consideration, ensuring that the matters are adjudicated based on the specific facts and applicable legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276091</link>
      <description>The appeals of both the department and the assessee were allowed in part. The Tribunal remanded several issues back to the AO or CIT (A) for fresh consideration, ensuring that the matters are adjudicated based on the specific facts and applicable legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>