<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) was unjustified in questioning the commercial decision of the assessee regarding the share premium collected. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 60.24 crores made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 24.10.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) was unjustified in questioning the commercial decision of the assessee regarding the share premium collected. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 60.24 crores made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 24.10.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>