<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1436 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to estimate the income at 5% of the goods sold and deleting the enhancement made by the CIT(A) under Section 68. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) cannot enhance the assessment by discovering new sources of income not considered by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1436 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the AO to estimate the income at 5% of the goods sold and deleting the enhancement made by the CIT(A) under Section 68. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) cannot enhance the assessment by discovering new sources of income not considered by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>