<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1434 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) could not impose a retrospective TDS obligation on the assessee. The payments made to Amazon Web Services (AWS) were for services and did not constitute &#039;royalty&#039;. Therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not warranted. Both appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1434 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) could not impose a retrospective TDS obligation on the assessee. The payments made to Amazon Web Services (AWS) were for services and did not constitute &#039;royalty&#039;. Therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not warranted. Both appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>