<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1430 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369464</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had adequately proven the source of the funds from the sale of shares held as investments, and the addition was based on suspicion rather than concrete evidence. The judgment was pronounced on 24.10.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1430 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369464</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had adequately proven the source of the funds from the sale of shares held as investments, and the addition was based on suspicion rather than concrete evidence. The judgment was pronounced on 24.10.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>