<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369459</link>
    <description>The NCLT rejected the appellant&#039;s applications for further extensions, emphasizing the need to protect depositors and the lack of bona fide efforts by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, with the tribunal highlighting the stringent provisions of Section 74 and the importance of upholding depositors&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369459</link>
      <description>The NCLT rejected the appellant&#039;s applications for further extensions, emphasizing the need to protect depositors and the lack of bona fide efforts by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, with the tribunal highlighting the stringent provisions of Section 74 and the importance of upholding depositors&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>