<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1424 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369458</link>
    <description>A later trade notice on yellow peas was treated as clarificatory of the 25.04.2018 import restriction and not as a fresh amendment, because it only explained how the expression &quot;already imported&quot; and advance payments were to operate. The court further held that imports already completed under interim protection could be preserved, but the petitioners could not compel clearance of the remaining unarrived quantity, as it was not shown to have been sufficiently committed to transit before the restriction took effect. Relief was therefore confined to goods already cleared, and the challenge failed for the balance quantity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1424 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369458</link>
      <description>A later trade notice on yellow peas was treated as clarificatory of the 25.04.2018 import restriction and not as a fresh amendment, because it only explained how the expression &quot;already imported&quot; and advance payments were to operate. The court further held that imports already completed under interim protection could be preserved, but the petitioners could not compel clearance of the remaining unarrived quantity, as it was not shown to have been sufficiently committed to transit before the restriction took effect. Relief was therefore confined to goods already cleared, and the challenge failed for the balance quantity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>