https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276079 The court determined that the Hindu family idol, recognized as a juristic entity, required a human custodian for its preservation and maintenance. The 1888 deed dedicated real estate in trust for the idol, prohibiting its transfer without suitable arrangements. The right of worship could be partitioned among heirs, ensuring each had a designated period for worship. The court directed the appointment of a disinterested next friend for the idol and remitted the case to the High Court for further proceedings, with parties bearing their own costs. en-us Sat, 25 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:35:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276079 The court determined that the Hindu family idol, recognized as a juristic entity, required a human custodian for its preservation and maintenance. The 1888 deed dedicated real estate in trust for the idol, prohibiting its transfer without suitable arrangements. The right of worship could be partitioned among heirs, ensuring each had a designated period for worship. The court directed the appointment of a disinterested next friend for the idol and remitted the case to the High Court for further proceedings, with parties bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 25 Apr 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276079