<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1400 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369434</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied the stay of demand for Rs. 9,02,42,930 and set aside the additions under Sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The assessee was directed to produce the directors of the investor companies and provide further evidence to substantiate the valuation report. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1400 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369434</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied the stay of demand for Rs. 9,02,42,930 and set aside the additions under Sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The assessee was directed to produce the directors of the investor companies and provide further evidence to substantiate the valuation report. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>