https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369413 The Court directed the respondent to present the original file for review regarding the seizure of goods under Section 110(1) of the Customs Act. It emphasized adherence to Section 111 provisions for determining confiscation liability. Additionally, the Court sought clarification on the use of imported steel plates for manufacturing and ordered the release of seized goods upon depositing specified amounts and complying with tax obligations. The case was adjourned for further discussions on substantive matters, including compliance with permissions and tax liabilities related to duty-free raw materials. en-us Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369413 The Court directed the respondent to present the original file for review regarding the seizure of goods under Section 110(1) of the Customs Act. It emphasized adherence to Section 111 provisions for determining confiscation liability. Additionally, the Court sought clarification on the use of imported steel plates for manufacturing and ordered the release of seized goods upon depositing specified amounts and complying with tax obligations. The case was adjourned for further discussions on substantive matters, including compliance with permissions and tax liabilities related to duty-free raw materials. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369413