<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1374 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369408</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal nullified the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the appellants for delayed payment of service tax. The tribunal considered the regular payment history of the appellants, attributed the delay to financial constraints, and found no fraudulent intent. Consequently, the tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and set it aside, allowing the appeal against the penalty under Section 76.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1374 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369408</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal nullified the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the appellants for delayed payment of service tax. The tribunal considered the regular payment history of the appellants, attributed the delay to financial constraints, and found no fraudulent intent. Consequently, the tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and set it aside, allowing the appeal against the penalty under Section 76.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>