https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369407 The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as 'export service', entitling them to a cash refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit. However, the credit availed on Building Maintenance Service and Rent-a-cab Service was denied. The matter was remanded to calculate the admissible refund amount, excluding the denied input services. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the judgment pronounced on September 28, 2018. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369407 The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant qualified as 'export service', entitling them to a cash refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit. However, the credit availed on Building Maintenance Service and Rent-a-cab Service was denied. The matter was remanded to calculate the admissible refund amount, excluding the denied input services. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the judgment pronounced on September 28, 2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369407