<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1366 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit based on alleged irregularities in availing credit. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was set aside as the Tribunal found no violation of Rule 4(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis of a similar Mumbai case and the subsequent amendment under Notification No. 06/2015 supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the grant of consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1366 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of cenvat credit based on alleged irregularities in availing credit. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was set aside as the Tribunal found no violation of Rule 4(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis of a similar Mumbai case and the subsequent amendment under Notification No. 06/2015 supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the grant of consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>