<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1365 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for excise duty on bought out items and granting the benefit of cum duty price for the Warping Machine. The Tribunal also provided detailed reasoning for each issue, emphasizing the legal principles and precedents involved in reaching its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1365 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for excise duty on bought out items and granting the benefit of cum duty price for the Warping Machine. The Tribunal also provided detailed reasoning for each issue, emphasizing the legal principles and precedents involved in reaching its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>