<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (7) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276059</link>
    <description>Compensation paid on bona fide premature termination of a managing agency agreement was treated as business expenditure deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The arrangement was found to be a commercial transaction entered into to enable the company to take over management through its board and to end a recurring managing agency commission liability. As there was no material showing a device for distribution of profits, gratuity, or any improper purpose, and the payment was supported by internal approval and shareholder sanction, the expenditure satisfied the test of commercial expediency and was allowable as incurred wholly and exclusively for business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (7) TMI 56 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276059</link>
      <description>Compensation paid on bona fide premature termination of a managing agency agreement was treated as business expenditure deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The arrangement was found to be a commercial transaction entered into to enable the company to take over management through its board and to end a recurring managing agency commission liability. As there was no material showing a device for distribution of profits, gratuity, or any improper purpose, and the payment was supported by internal approval and shareholder sanction, the expenditure satisfied the test of commercial expediency and was allowable as incurred wholly and exclusively for business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>