<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1355 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369389</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2011-12 as subsequent developments eliminated the basis for the notice. The Assessing Officer referred the valuation of properties to the Department of Valuation Officer, who confirmed the valuation at par with the sale consideration. The Revenue agreed no additions were necessary in the fresh assessment, leading to the notice being set aside, ending the litigation. Other issues raised by the Revenue were left open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1355 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369389</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2011-12 as subsequent developments eliminated the basis for the notice. The Assessing Officer referred the valuation of properties to the Department of Valuation Officer, who confirmed the valuation at par with the sale consideration. The Revenue agreed no additions were necessary in the fresh assessment, leading to the notice being set aside, ending the litigation. Other issues raised by the Revenue were left open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>