<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capital Gains Case: Lack of Documentation on Possession Delivery Invalidates Revenue&#039;s Assumption in Joint Development Agreement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42288</link>
    <description>Capital gain - JDA - Transfer of capital asset - There is no document by which the revenue can come to the conclusion that there was delivery of possession. The mere fact that development of the property cannot be done without possession cannot be the basis to come to a conclusion that possession was delivered in part performance of the agreement for sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Capital Gains Case: Lack of Documentation on Possession Delivery Invalidates Revenue&#039;s Assumption in Joint Development Agreement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42288</link>
      <description>Capital gain - JDA - Transfer of capital asset - There is no document by which the revenue can come to the conclusion that there was delivery of possession. The mere fact that development of the property cannot be done without possession cannot be the basis to come to a conclusion that possession was delivered in part performance of the agreement for sale.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>