<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1344 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of an order regarding the quantification of notional expenses under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules for AY 2010-11. The Tribunal affirmed that it had considered all grounds raised by the assessee in the original appeal and found no merit in revisiting the issue. The decision was rendered on September 11, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1344 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of an order regarding the quantification of notional expenses under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules for AY 2010-11. The Tribunal affirmed that it had considered all grounds raised by the assessee in the original appeal and found no merit in revisiting the issue. The decision was rendered on September 11, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>