<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369377</link>
    <description>Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be sustained where the assessee has not earned or claimed any exempt income. The first appellate authority deleted the disallowance, relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s view that Section 14A does not apply in the absence of exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369377</link>
      <description>Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be sustained where the assessee has not earned or claimed any exempt income. The first appellate authority deleted the disallowance, relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s view that Section 14A does not apply in the absence of exempt income. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>