<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1334 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369368</link>
    <description>The court allowed W.P.Nos. 10329 and 10330 of 2008, directing the refund of Rs. 35,35,220/- with interest to the petitioner, subject to demonstrating no unjust enrichment. W.P.No.10331 of 2008 was dismissed as relief was already addressed. The court emphasized fair and reasonable actions by customs authorities and adherence to legal provisions under Sections 22 and 23 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1334 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369368</link>
      <description>The court allowed W.P.Nos. 10329 and 10330 of 2008, directing the refund of Rs. 35,35,220/- with interest to the petitioner, subject to demonstrating no unjust enrichment. W.P.No.10331 of 2008 was dismissed as relief was already addressed. The court emphasized fair and reasonable actions by customs authorities and adherence to legal provisions under Sections 22 and 23 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>