https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369353 An apparent error was identified in the order disposing of the appeal because the dispute concerned default in payment of monthly excise duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. On that basis, the rectification application was allowed, the earlier order was recalled, and the appeal was restored to its original number for further hearing. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369353 An apparent error was identified in the order disposing of the appeal because the dispute concerned default in payment of monthly excise duty under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. On that basis, the rectification application was allowed, the earlier order was recalled, and the appeal was restored to its original number for further hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369353