<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1716 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276034</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) extended the time for a respondent company to repay outstanding deposits plus interest until 31st March 2017. Despite warnings and extensions, the company failed to make payments. The Tribunal directed the company to pay by the deadline, emphasizing potential penalties for non-compliance, including disqualification of directors and legal actions. The Tribunal ordered the closure of the Company Petition and stressed that further extensions without valid reasons were not permissible, especially when the company showed no initiative in repaying the deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1716 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276034</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) extended the time for a respondent company to repay outstanding deposits plus interest until 31st March 2017. Despite warnings and extensions, the company failed to make payments. The Tribunal directed the company to pay by the deadline, emphasizing potential penalties for non-compliance, including disqualification of directors and legal actions. The Tribunal ordered the closure of the Company Petition and stressed that further extensions without valid reasons were not permissible, especially when the company showed no initiative in repaying the deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>