<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14957</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the disallowance of an application under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner&#039;s decision not to waive interest amounts was upheld, emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of discretion and adherence to legal procedures. The court found no arbitrariness or error in the Commissioner&#039;s actions, concluding that the discretion was exercised fairly and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14957</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the disallowance of an application under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner&#039;s decision not to waive interest amounts was upheld, emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of discretion and adherence to legal procedures. The court found no arbitrariness or error in the Commissioner&#039;s actions, concluding that the discretion was exercised fairly and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>