https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276015 An Additional District Judge attached to a District Court was held to be part of the same court, so an appeal presented before that officer was not invalid merely because it was filed before an additional judge. Claims for rateable distribution under the Code of Civil Procedure could be entertained by the court of highest grade receiving the attached property or sale proceeds, and a fresh execution application was not necessary. The attachment was treated as following the property into its converted form, so the attaching creditor's claim continued against the sale proceeds. The funds realised were "assets" available for rateable distribution, and prior attachment by every claimant was not required. en-us Mon, 31 Aug 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:34:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276015 An Additional District Judge attached to a District Court was held to be part of the same court, so an appeal presented before that officer was not invalid merely because it was filed before an additional judge. Claims for rateable distribution under the Code of Civil Procedure could be entertained by the court of highest grade receiving the attached property or sale proceeds, and a fresh execution application was not necessary. The attachment was treated as following the property into its converted form, so the attaching creditor's claim continued against the sale proceeds. The funds realised were "assets" available for rateable distribution, and prior attachment by every claimant was not required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Aug 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276015