https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276006 A settlement deed in favour of a minor was treated as a valid gift, or alternatively as an onerous gift under section 127 of the Transfer of Property Act, so it was not void merely because the donee was a minor or because an undivided coparcenary share was involved. The family's subsequent acceptance and implementation of the arrangement supported its validity as a family settlement, and the plaintiff acquired title under it. The instrument was also construed as giving the plaintiff a life interest in the whole property, with remainder to the donor's male issue only after the death of both grantees. On that construction, the donor and his sons could not take possession during her lifetime. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:23:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276006 A settlement deed in favour of a minor was treated as a valid gift, or alternatively as an onerous gift under section 127 of the Transfer of Property Act, so it was not void merely because the donee was a minor or because an undivided coparcenary share was involved. The family's subsequent acceptance and implementation of the arrangement supported its validity as a family settlement, and the plaintiff acquired title under it. The instrument was also construed as giving the plaintiff a life interest in the whole property, with remainder to the donor's male issue only after the death of both grantees. On that construction, the donor and his sons could not take possession during her lifetime. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276006