<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1879 (2) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276005</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court&#039;s decree. The respondents acquired only the one undivided third share in the eight-anna share of mouzah Bissumbhurpore, belonging to Adit Sahai, with the right to partition. The appellants were confirmed in possession of the property, subject to the respondents&#039; rights. Costs in lower courts were to be apportioned as per usual practice, and the appellants were awarded the costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 1879 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1879 (2) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276005</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court&#039;s decree. The respondents acquired only the one undivided third share in the eight-anna share of mouzah Bissumbhurpore, belonging to Adit Sahai, with the right to partition. The appellants were confirmed in possession of the property, subject to the respondents&#039; rights. Costs in lower courts were to be apportioned as per usual practice, and the appellants were awarded the costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 1879 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>