https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276004 Service of notice and filing an application for possession under the tenancy law did not, by themselves, terminate the tenancy; termination became effective only in the manner fixed by the statutory scheme and the tenant remained in possession until lawful dispossession. A person in lawful cultivating possession on the vesting date therefore acquired statutory occupancy rights under the abolition of inams law. The earlier determination of the respondent's tenant status, having been directly and substantially decided between the parties, could not be reopened in later proceedings and operated as res judicata. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276004 Service of notice and filing an application for possession under the tenancy law did not, by themselves, terminate the tenancy; termination became effective only in the manner fixed by the statutory scheme and the tenant remained in possession until lawful dispossession. A person in lawful cultivating possession on the vesting date therefore acquired statutory occupancy rights under the abolition of inams law. The earlier determination of the respondent's tenant status, having been directly and substantially decided between the parties, could not be reopened in later proceedings and operated as res judicata. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276004