<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 1 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14953</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee, engaged in the business of engineering contractor using a process of pressure piling, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking under sections 80HHA and 80J of the Income-tax Act. The activities undertaken were not considered manufacturing or production of articles as required by the law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee was overturned, ruling in favor of the Department. The court ordered no costs against the non-applicant and directed the transmission of the order to the Tribunal for further action, emphasizing the need to meet all statutory requirements for claiming deductions under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 1 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14953</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee, engaged in the business of engineering contractor using a process of pressure piling, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking under sections 80HHA and 80J of the Income-tax Act. The activities undertaken were not considered manufacturing or production of articles as required by the law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee was overturned, ruling in favor of the Department. The court ordered no costs against the non-applicant and directed the transmission of the order to the Tribunal for further action, emphasizing the need to meet all statutory requirements for claiming deductions under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>