<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (7) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276002</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 protects workmen concerned in a pending appeal from punitive action without prior written permission of the Appellate Tribunal. The expression &quot;workman concerned&quot; was construed to mean a direct and closer connection than mere interest, but not so narrowly as to exclude workers whose individual dispute has been taken up collectively as an industrial dispute. On that basis, a workman who was part of the collective dispute remained within the statutory protection, and dismissal during the pendency of the appeal without permission was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:17:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (7) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276002</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 protects workmen concerned in a pending appeal from punitive action without prior written permission of the Appellate Tribunal. The expression &quot;workman concerned&quot; was construed to mean a direct and closer connection than mere interest, but not so narrowly as to exclude workers whose individual dispute has been taken up collectively as an industrial dispute. On that basis, a workman who was part of the collective dispute remained within the statutory protection, and dismissal during the pendency of the appeal without permission was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>