<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh consideration of the issues raised by the A.O. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes as the CIT(A) was found to have not adequately addressed the findings and conducted a thorough investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for a fresh consideration of the issues raised by the A.O. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes as the CIT(A) was found to have not adequately addressed the findings and conducted a thorough investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>