<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the revision under section 263 was invalid as the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) were not applicable. The Tribunal deemed the directive for further enquiry into the valuation of the premium on shares unnecessary and quashed the order under section 263. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the revision under section 263 was invalid as the provisions of section 56(2)(viib) were not applicable. The Tribunal deemed the directive for further enquiry into the valuation of the premium on shares unnecessary and quashed the order under section 263. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>