<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</link>
    <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner, considering discrepancies in the prosecution&#039;s case, lack of criminal antecedents, and previous complaint-free parcel bookings. The petitioner was required to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, provide personal details, report monthly to the police, and seek court permission before leaving the country. The court emphasized that the bail decision did not affect the trial proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</link>
      <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner, considering discrepancies in the prosecution&#039;s case, lack of criminal antecedents, and previous complaint-free parcel bookings. The petitioner was required to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, provide personal details, report monthly to the police, and seek court permission before leaving the country. The court emphasized that the bail decision did not affect the trial proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>