<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires strict satisfaction of twin conditions before bail can be granted in a commercial quantity case. The Delhi HC found material discrepancies in the prosecution record, including booking details, consignor identity, documentary trail, sampling process, description and weight of the alleged substance, and the forensic description of the sample. It also noted that the Section 67 statement was not unequivocally incriminating and had been retracted, and that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents. On that basis, the Court held that the Section 37 requirements were satisfied and granted bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires strict satisfaction of twin conditions before bail can be granted in a commercial quantity case. The Delhi HC found material discrepancies in the prosecution record, including booking details, consignor identity, documentary trail, sampling process, description and weight of the alleged substance, and the forensic description of the sample. It also noted that the Section 67 statement was not unequivocally incriminating and had been retracted, and that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents. On that basis, the Court held that the Section 37 requirements were satisfied and granted bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>