<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1715 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275992</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, with the Tribunal affirming the sufficiency of the appellant&#039;s debit notes as valid documents for the refund claim under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The rejection of the refund claim based on improper documents was deemed without merit, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further review and issuance of an appropriate order within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1715 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275992</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, with the Tribunal affirming the sufficiency of the appellant&#039;s debit notes as valid documents for the refund claim under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The rejection of the refund claim based on improper documents was deemed without merit, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further review and issuance of an appropriate order within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>