https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275994 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the appellant's refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant to a recipient in Denmark met the conditions for export of service under Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules, 1994, based on the location of the service provider, recipient, compliance with legal provisions, and payment received in foreign exchange. The decision clarified the eligibility of the services for export classification, resulting in the appellant's success in the appeal. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:09:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275994 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the appellant's refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant to a recipient in Denmark met the conditions for export of service under Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules, 1994, based on the location of the service provider, recipient, compliance with legal provisions, and payment received in foreign exchange. The decision clarified the eligibility of the services for export classification, resulting in the appellant's success in the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275994