<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 69 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14944</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on raw materials was treated as reducing purchase cost and, on the same balancing principle, had to be reflected in closing stock valuation. The Assessing Officer&#039;s method was rejected because it credited the full purchase cost without carrying the Modvat element into inventory, which would distort profit computation. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s net method was held not to understate profits, the proviso to section 145(1) could not be invoked, and section 145A was held inapplicable to the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 69 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14944</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on raw materials was treated as reducing purchase cost and, on the same balancing principle, had to be reflected in closing stock valuation. The Assessing Officer&#039;s method was rejected because it credited the full purchase cost without carrying the Modvat element into inventory, which would distort profit computation. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s net method was held not to understate profits, the proviso to section 145(1) could not be invoked, and section 145A was held inapplicable to the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>