https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275984 The Court determined that the document in question was a mutual reciprocal Will, not a joint Will, and therefore irrevocable by one party. It was considered a valid family arrangement under Hindu law, preventing unilateral revocation. The surviving brother could not claim joint family properties by survivorship due to the mutual Will's modification of normal devolution rules. The judgment was reversed, and both suits were decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275984 The Court determined that the document in question was a mutual reciprocal Will, not a joint Will, and therefore irrevocable by one party. It was considered a valid family arrangement under Hindu law, preventing unilateral revocation. The surviving brother could not claim joint family properties by survivorship due to the mutual Will's modification of normal devolution rules. The judgment was reversed, and both suits were decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275984